
Television is the first truly democratic culture – the first culture available to everybody and entirely governed by what the people want. The most terrifying thing is what people do want.
– Clive Barnes
The self-righteous and power-hungry “Parents Television Council” is at it again. Recently the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal by the FCC of an appeals court ruling upholding Newscorp’s challenge of FCC rules on “fleeting” uses of four-letter words on awards shows. Newscorp’s point was that since the words were not uttered in a “sexual or excretory” context, and no fines were imposed, the FCC should clarify its standards and drop their complaint. The appeals court agreed, as any sane person would.
Now the PTC is all cranked up. Current PTC head Tim Winter is praising the fact that the case has been accepted for the high court. But he huffs to his e-list:
I’m definitely relieved the Supreme Court did not uphold the shocking lower court decision that allows the worst kind of profanity to be broadcast on the public airwaves at any time of the day or night, even in front of children. But this is really NOT a victory for our cause — at lest not yet. The Supreme Court will not even hear this case until the fall — and they won’t issue a decision until even later. What’s worse, the Court could still rule in favor of the networks, leaving them free to air this kind of material wherever they like, whenever they like, as often as they like.
They are framing this legal technicality as some sort of moral battle for the souls of “the children.” Back when I was promoting FX’s The Shield, a show the PTC tried to have boycotted and cancelled, I emailed former PTC head Brent Bozell and told him how I felt about his meddling in my livelihood–and other people’s entertainment choices. Somehow, that got me on the PTC’s e-list. The email continues:
American families can’t afford to wait for the Supreme Court to act sometime next year for the FCC to stop the flood of sexually graphic and profane content coming into our homes on a nightly basis. In just the last few weeks, we’ve seen strippers in tassels, and naked women running through a gambling casino on prime time broadcast television. Even more shocking, we’ve also heard two prominent actresses — Dianne Keaton [fuck] on Good Morning America, and Jane Fonda [cunt] on the Today show — uttering four letter words on morning talk shows! That’s why we’re calling on all friends and supporters of the Parents Television Council to flood the Congress with demands for legislation that will guarantee children are not exposed to nudity on television, and to the worst kind of profane language wherever they go.
Or so goes the false dichotomy: either impose government censorship on every second of every program, or suffer an orgiastic free-for-all that will rape and permanently scar children’s minds. But this silly caricature doesn’t take into account that TV networks are ruled by ratings and advertisers. If people don’t like something, they tune out. They don’t need someone else to tell them what and what not to like. So TV has become a reflection of society–not the other way around.
But that doesn’t sit well with the power-brokers who want to undemocratically control other people’s entertainment. To really understand what kind of scumbags make up the PTC, you have to go back to “nipplegate” (pictured above) which occurred on February 1, 2004. Janet’s Jackson’s breast was exposed at the Super Bowl for a few seconds (horrors). Opportunist and PTC scumbag-in-chief L. Brent Bozell III saw his opening, and the lifelong conservative crusader rode the mile-wide-inch-deep “moral outrage” and the red-state religious puritanical fervor to national prominence and congressional hearings. Television has never been the same.
According to a Mediaweek article from December of 2004, more than 99% of all complaints to the FCC following nipplegate came from PTC members, making it more like a lobbying organization rather than any representation of grass-roots sentiments:
The number of indecency complaints had soared dramatically to more than 240,000 in the previous year, Powell said. The figure was up from roughly 14,000 in 2002, and from fewer than 350 in each of the two previous years. There was, Powell said, “a dramatic rise in public concern and outrage about what is being broadcast into their homes.”
What Powell did not reveal apparently because he was unaware was the source of the complaints. According to a new FCC estimate obtained by Mediaweek, nearly all indecency complaints in 2003 99.8 percent were filed by the Parents Television Council, an activist group.
This year, the trend has continued, and perhaps intensified. Through early October, 99.9 percent of indecency complaints aside from those concerning the Janet Jackson “wardrobe malfunction” during the Super Bowl halftime show broadcast on CBS were brought by the PTC, according to the FCC analysis dated Oct. 1. (The agency last week estimated it had received 1,068,767 complaints about broadcast indecency so far this year; the Super Bowl broadcast accounted for over 540,000, according to commissioners’ statements.)
The prominent role played by the PTC has raised concerns among critics of the FCC’s crackdown on indecency. “It means that really a tiny minority with a very focused political agenda is trying to censor American television and radio,” said Jonathan Rintels, president and executive director of the Center for Creative Voices in Media, an artists’ advocacy group.
And this is the heart of the matter. A tiny minority of arch-conservatives have hijacked the notion of “decency” to advance their narrow fascist agenda, which is at its core a strictly religious agenda (Bozell is a colleague of blowhard Bill Donohue and also sits on the board of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights). They are not just opposed to sex, they are opposed to humor. They are not just opposed to specific acts of violence, they are opposed to entire themes. Since we live in a democracy, and people have the right to freedom of speech and expression, Bozell and Co. had to figure out how to enlist the mindless masses to support censorship. “Decency” has become the battle cry.
Any advertiser who makes a media buy in an “indecent” program can be targeted for a boycott. This kind of pressure directly curtails freedom of speech. Who elected these unaccountable morons to represent all parents? Who is watching the watchers? Well for one, the Center for Media and Democracy, which lists the following private groups and foundations who contribute to the PTC’s censorship efforts and largely provide the organization’s annual $4.5 million budget:
Ackerman Presbyterian Church, Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, Cly-Del Manufacturing Company, Dodge Jones Foundation, Philip M. Friedmann Family Charitable Trust, Grover Hermann Foundation, Hickory Foundation, The Holloway Family Foundation, John E. and Sue M. Jackson Charitable Trust, the Forrest C. Lattner Foundation, The Schloss Family Foundation, The Stuart Family Foundation, Bill and Katie Weaver Charitable Trust, Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation
It’s so obvious, I shouldn’t even have to say it: Arts and entertainment are important ways society holds conversations about real issues and formulates cultural rules. We do this so every act doesn’t have to be covered by a law. Cultural codes are much more fluid and allow for people to change their minds by taking context into consideration. In short, the PTC would like to ruin this process by completely controlling how artists, writers, directors and actors are allowed to have those conversations with the viewing public. They want to impose this control by any means necessary.
Now I have no trouble admitting that the Jackson/Timberlake stunt was contextually inappropriate for the Super Bowl audience. Having said that, it’s clear it was not the intent of CBS to somehow subject viewers to “indecency.” People see more exposed flesh at the beach on a sunny California weekend. But even if it was a punishable offense (breach of contract, etc.) any penalty should have been limited to the people involved in the incident–Timberlake and Jackson themselves. But the firestorm touched off by that brief flash was out of any reasonable proportion. Here’s how it affected me and my work personally: On The Shield and Nip/Tuck promos, we used to include the occasional “ass,” “bitch,” or sex scene. After nipplegate, every promo had to be reviewed by the legal department, and basically be sanitized to be suitable for all ages, even though the shows were clearly adult-themed TV-MA material.
And that brings up my next point: the PTC is all lathered up about how TV ratings are falsified. Well it’s clear that they don’t want these shows airing at all, so to me it’s highly disingenuous to spend so much time quibbling about the ratings. The only rating the PTC cares about would be “unacceptable.” In fact, the PTC has started issuing the opposite “seal-of-approval” type ratings–to Sky Angel (offering the Faith Package, Family Package and Family Values Pack in case you’re not really sure), Trinity Broadcasting, and Cleanflicks. So it’s pretty clear that the PTC won’t be satisfied until every entertainment offering is suitably “Disneyfied”–and suitably religious.
But wait, isn’t Disney supposed to be the gold standard for family values? Not according to the PTC. Disney president Robert Iger opposes the PTC’s attempts at censorship. And the PTC is taking him to task for it.
It seems there is no end to the hubris of these self-appointed moral guardians, many of whom have skeletons in their own closet. If they had their way, most of the best programs of the past decade would never have made it on TV. These include The Shield, Nip/Tuck, Dexter, Monk, Rescue Me, Sex in the City, South Park, The Family Guy, and countless other gems. Even Ugly Betty isn’t spared their conserva-wrath. So I say fuck ’em if they can’t take a joke–and joke ’em if they can’t take a fuck.
9 comments
Funny how the RW always claims liberals are the “nanny state” people. In reality they’re the ones who want the government to regulate everything to the nth degree. Back when I was a child if my parents didn’t want me to see something on television (and my mother was quite the prude) they simply refused to let me watch it. They didn’t demand the government whitewash everything so *nobody* could watch anything they find objectionable.
I guess some parents just don’t want to parent anymore. Yet they then turn around and preach “personal responsibility”. Such hypocrisy.
This kind of thing happens because of a very real slippery slope. The FCC did not come into existence because of content, but that function it decided it had has become it’s primary focus nowadays. And now people think that TV is governmentally controlled, and thus they have a right to control it as the self-appointed ‘voice of the people’.
Television is a corporate entity, something you choose to consume. Don’t like it, don’t consume it. Don’t let your kids consume it.
The FCC’s rules are like the enumerated powers and congress. If you don’t hold an entity to exactly what they’re allowed to do and immediately get rid of them if they step over, they will walk all over you and do things that were never intended.
Buffy & Alex,
I think what religious conservatives are afraid of is that kids will not like the “clean” programming as much as the more “racy” offerings. Failing to effectively compete for their kids attention, supporters of the PTC want to “rig” the entertainment landscape so as to remove any hint of said competition.
Which would allow them free rein to essentially lie to their kids about life, the universe and everything–perpetuating their own failed Pollyanna perspective.
Actually, Buffy, I’d say that these mythical Liberals I keep hearing about (I’m kidding, I know they exist) do want to regulate everything that people do, whereas conservatives don’t want to regulate what people do, they just don’t want people doing anything at all.
[…] The US is a haven for Protect the Children nutters. Black Sun posted an interesting, if chilling, blog about the Parents Television Council last week. […]
You raise some interesting points in your post. Here are some facts that you might find interesting. An overwhelming majority of Americans (91%) object to government deciding what they are able to watch on television. When activists talk about protecting children instead of parents—here’s what they’re talking about: sixty-eight percent of the country’s 110 million television-viewing households do not include children under age 18 and households with children have different challenges to face due to the varying ages of kids within each family. Currently, there are 11 million households with children age 6-11, 15 million households with children age 0-5 and 9 million households with children 12-17.
TV has come a long way from the days of three channels and rabbit ears antennas. Today’s TV audiences are putting to use broadband, DVRs, TV video on demand, iPods and cell phones to greatly expand their choices about what, when, where and how to watch TV. New technology means consumers have more selection than ever and more control than ever over what they see on TV. We all have more choices and parents have more tools to ensure their kids only see what’s right for them. Let’s let parents decide—not government, for all of us.
There is more information to be found at http://www.TelevisionWatch.org
It is absolutely ridiculous to say that the PTC wants to eliminate all immoral content from television. They focus primarily on the “family hour” and try to prevent content that is essentially pornographic from being shown on basic cable. When I was in my teens (late eighties – early nineties) this would not even have been a question, this stuff would not have been aired.
However I think that they are fighting a losing battle. People with real moral sensibility are just not watching network television anymore (never mind basic cable).
On the other hand those people who claim that the TV companies are just responding to the market are either misinformed or they’re liars; family friendly content has always made more money than smut.
Weston Zach,
You give away your own censorious attitudes when you use words like “smut” and “real moral sensibility.” Calling the bland fare on broadcast TV “pornographic” is laughable. But OK–I understand the mind set. I’d put money on the table that when you say “real moral sensibility,” that’s code for “religious conservative.” But you’re sadly mistaken if you think that’s the only morality that works. I’d argue that exposing kids to a wider range of content leaves them much better prepared to navigate their lives than does a diet of repression and entertainment sanitized “for their protection.” It’s certainly how I raised my three sons. They watched PG and R rated content from probably the age of 10 or so. We discussed the implications, and they all came away with a strong sense of personal ethics. You conservatives think you’re going to protect your kids from everything, and then they magically grow up and are prepared to be adults overnight on their 18th birthday. It’s hogwash, and you’re brainwashed if you think that works.
Anyway, you and your family are free not to watch television or movies, just don’t try to control content for the rest of us. I’ll give you that over-the-air TV should maybe be regulated a little more tightly than cable, if only because it’s a public resource. Cable companies have also become much more aware of the situation, But once a family pays for a cable into their homes, they should be prepared for whatever they get. Some cable companies allow parents to block channels. There are lots of options. Learn to use them!
I remember the ’80s too, when the porn channels were right there on basic cable with everything else. Sometimes they were scrambled, but you could still hear the sound. A lot of people I knew had cracked cable boxes and the porn channels were freely available. Now, with digital cable, that’s next to impossible. So if anything, the situation has improved for the “family values” crowd.
You know, Weston, I can never keep myself from asking: why is sex not a family value? How is it that the very thing that brought kids into the world should now be hidden from them like it will permanently damage them if they see it? I mean prior to a few hundred years ago, families all shared a single room, and sex was just a fact of life for kids. Can you seriously argue that our society is healthier now that we hide and repress sex into the shadow? I don’t think so. And I also always wonder why the family values types get all bent about sex, but don’t seem to mind seeing people shot and decapitated. Think about it.
We don’t need Pat Boone, Brent Bozell, and Tim Winter deciding what’s offensive. Period.
I’m so happy that today courts threw out the ridiculous FCC fine over nipplegate. Maybe there’s hope for us after all.
[…] Bozell III, who also founded the nipplegate-fueled complaint mill the Parents Television Council (previous article). It’s no surprise that CNS is running this type of slanderous editorial. It’s […]